February 19, 2020

Please reload

Recent Posts

Stop Icing Your Arm

February 19, 2020

Please reload

Featured Posts

The athlete "Testing" dilemma

August 21, 2013


Our athletes just completed their summer post testing in what has become quite an event. Parents, athletes, and coaches alike are eager to hear the numbers and snap judgement on if the work/time was worth it. While we get great results on the "testing," it has become too much of a focus with all parties involved. We have to ask ourselves - what do these tests show us about an athletes ability to perform or develop in their sport? The standard strength and conditioning test are in a single plane of motion unlike any dymanic sport played on a field or court. After all, what makes athletes so special is thier ability to do unmeasurable things; redirecting your body in the air to get a ball, a quarterback changing his arm slot to throw around defender, transitioning from reaching for a ball to throwing someone out, etc. When we started this company we focused on hitting standard testing numbers. The entire program was geared to perfect and improve the test we ran. In short, we had phenomenal results on the testing numbers but our athletes were not translating to the field which motivated myself to find improved training methods that would transfer to sport. To respect your time, I am going to take three examples in the 40, pro agility, and the vertical jump and give my opinion on the evaluation and the affects of the test on the athlete.

The 40 is a hot button in football, but when football players use their "football speed" to break a game open it's always in transition and never from a standstill. We could argue that the distance the 10-yard dash would be a better assessment for Lineman while a "flying 25" would be most appropriate for skill players. The term flying mean that the athlete would have 5-10 yards to gain momentum before being time for 25 yards. Even still you are talking about putting a dynamic sport where timing, angles, and power have more of an influence than starting from a stance and sprinting straight ahead. Several years ago an east texas football athlete had elite film but was shunned by many Big 12 teams because he was running 4.7 range 40's on the one day camp circuit. Kendall Wright now plays for the Tennessee Titans and  his college coach at Baylor, Art Briles no longer tests the 40 at all his football camps. It's worth mentioning that after college, Kendall trained for the combine and hit 4.4 after his combine prep training.

Kids and parents see the NFL combine and feel like the kids need to train for those events to get ready for football. The NFL combine is it's own sport and our NFL combine athletes have a very specific training program for it. We work on the skills of those test for hours and hours each week leading to the combine / pro day. That program does a very poor job of preparing our athletes for football (or anything else). After the combine we completely change the training focus to preparing for the NFL season. Never again do they work on test techniques or a program aimed at hitting "testing" numbers. Young football players need to focus on Mo-Sta-Bility (mobility, stability, flexibility), Strength, 3D Power, and Multidirectional/Transitional Speed. Instead they spend their time working on bench press and the 40. This emphasis on combine training has an increased effect on injuries and a disassociation between good testing numbers and good players. The psychological limitations athletes tend to put on themselves after hearing their 40 times is damaging enough. For example, kids that think they ran a 4.3 lose motivation to get better and kids that run a 5.0 think they cannot play. We recognize that there are some times of the year for kids to concentrate on testing, therefore, we need to help them master the test. In the Spring we will designate training for combine prep (high school and pro) and separate it from other training classes.


The pro agility test has widely been a deemed a valid test for an athlete's ability to change direction. In several studies the 5-10-5(pro agility) has been proven to NOT differentiate between high and lower level athletes. What is missing from the pro agility test? Inclusion of perceptual and decision making components along with the fact that you cannot distinguish a deficit on one side or the other. . Reaction is missing. The ability to compare change of direction to reaction and decision makingcapabilities is what we need to if we want to measure multi-directional speed. To test this we need a testing construct that transfers to sport. The importance of decision making has often been overlooked within the context of agility training. What makes an athlete’s “agility” special is their unique ability to make changes in reaction to changes the see or foresee. An example of two test that would give us valid information for multi-directional speed would be the 5-0-5 and the Y reactive drill. The 5-0-5 is a non-reactive drill that allows you to test an athlete’s ability to cut on one side vs the other. The athlete sprints 10 yards (time starts at 5 yard line) and touches the line with the designated hand / side and sprints back through 5 yards. This gives us objective information on that athlete's ability to cut right vs left. This can help us identify weakness or coordination issues. The Y drill is a reactive drill where an athlete sprints 5 yards and makes an angle break through one gate or another depending on the coaches point, cue, or even a light directing them which way to go. This makes the drill reactive in nature and is great information on how athletes are processing their environment.

The vertical is a huge number for all of our jump sport athletes (among others) yet basketball/volleyball players rarely leap from a complete standstill and it's even more rare for them to jump straight up with no angulation. The ability to get off the ground with speed is precedent to the max height with athletes of comparable athletic ability. The greatest rebounders and playmakers react the fastest, can explode at any angulation, and land loaded to do it again. The best players hardly ever have the highest vertical. In the 2007 NBA combine Greg Oden jumped 34 inches in the vertical leap while Kevin Durant jump 33 1/2 inches, completed the agility drill in 11.67 seconds to Durant's 12.33 seconds, and finished the three-quarter court sprint in 3.27 seconds, ahead of Durant's 3.45 seconds. AND Durant finished with ZERO reps of 185 on bench press according to the report. Those vertical jumps may seem impressive but Oden is a center and Durant is a guard where NBA players average a 36-42 inch vertical jump. All being said, you don't see Durant getting out jumped or outplayed very often.

"If people question his strength, they're stupid," Former Texas' coach Rick Barnes said according to The Dallas Morning News. "If they are looking for professional weight lifters to come out of Texas, that's not what we're producing, we are producing ball players. There are a lot of guys who can bench press 300 pounds in the NBA who couldn't play dead in a cowboy movie. Kevin's the best player in the draft - period, at any position."

Barnes was right. Todd Wright served as the Texas Basketball Head Strength Coach(currently Philidelphia 76ers) and is highly regarded as one of the best jump sport strength coaches in the world. NBA players come from all over every off-season to train with him because his players show the training on the court, not on a silly test. APEC assistant director Kye Heck worked for Todd and we share common philosophies.


These are just three examples of testing that can show you the problem in putting too much stock into numbers. We as coaches must emphis